The FAA has issued a policy which is intended to clarify the definition
of ''Actively Engaged'' for purposes of issuing and renewing the A
& P Inspector Authorization. The new proposed rules are
summarized below, but please see
the
full NPRM.
PAMA Response to FAA-2010-1060 Policy Clarifying Definition
of Actively
Engaged for Purposes of Inspector Authorization
Tell
us What You Think!
Join the ongoing discussion in the PAMA
Legislative Issues Forum
to discuss what you think of the proposed regulations and what
suggestions PAMA should make to lawmakers before the new rules take
effect.

PAMA will be watching the dicussions closely and including
your feedback in our response to the FAA. Don't miss this chance to
make
your voice heard! PAMA will be submitting comments on the NPRM during
the comment period, which ends on December 6, 2010.
While PAMA applauds the FAA for attempting to clarify and standardize
the interpretation of the Federal Aviation Regulations and the FAA
orders, the proposed change in FAA-2010-1060 would not give
clarification to the term “Actively Engaged” but allow the ASI’s to
further confuse the requirement for issuing and renewing the Inspection
Authorization.
The Inspection Authorization (IA) has become the pinnacle of the
aviation maintenance certificates. The authorization is a sign of
accomplish and higher standard of excellence in the aviation
maintenance world. Holders of the authorization who are not in the
direct business of maintaining aircraft but closely associated with
aircraft airworthiness use it as a means of credibility. Losing the
authorization could have serious fallback on tech reps, maintenance
controllers, and educators.
In the proposed Amendment the notes to the FAA Order 8900.1 V5 CH5 Sec7
(A) reads “Note: Actively engaged means exercising the privileges of an
airframe and powerplant mechanic certificate in the maintenance of
civil aircraft. Applicants who are employed full-time in inspecting,
overhauling, repairing, preserving, or replacing parts on aircraft are
considered to be actively engaged. Applicants who are employed or
participate in inspecting, overhauling, repairing, preserving, or
replacing parts on aircraft on a part-time or occasional basis will be
evaluated by the ASI to determine whether the applicant is actively
engaged. The ASI will evaluate the scope of part-time or occasional
activity based on the type of maintenance activity, including any
special expertise required, and the quantity of maintenance activity
performed. To evaluate the scope of the part-time or occasional
maintenance activity, the ASI will use evidence or documentation
provided by the applicant showing inspection, overhauling, repairing,
preserving, or replacing parts on aircraft”. This note breaks down the
requirements into the following:
1. Exercising the privileges of a mechanic in the maintenance of civil
aircraft.
2. Full-time employed in the inspection, overhauling, repairing,
preserving, or replacing parts on aircraft.
3. Part-time employees must be evaluated by the ASI
With this interpretation and the fact that the ASI’s cannot deviate
from this “explanation”, leads the ASI’s interpretation of the
“clarification” to exclude many of the IA’s that are currently
effective per 14CFR65.83, which states that a mechanic cannot exercise
the privileges of their mechanic certificate unless they have within
the preceding 24 months:
- Served as a Mechanic for the previous 6 months
- Technically Supervised other Mechanics
- Executive Supervised Maintenance or Alterations
- Been engaged in and combination of the above
While the first part of the proposed change seems to corresponds to
14CFR65.83 it is not definitive in that reference so an ASI could state
that a Supervisor or Director of Maintenance, who may or may not
actually perform maintenance, be excluded because he is not fulfilling
the second part of the sentence in the proposed changed. There could
also be interpretation that Instructors at 14CFR147 Aviation
Maintenance Schools, Tech Reps, Maintenance Salesman, Maintenance
Coordinators, Maintenance Auditors, and other mechanics who are engaged
in some aspect of aviation maintenance be denied application or renewal
of their IA for the same reason.
The ramification of this Proposal as written is far-reaching affecting
those who hold certificates or titles required under 14CFR119,
14CFR135, 14CFR145, and 14CFR121. PAMA proposes the following change to
the note for FAA Order 8900.1 section 7 (A) 5-1279:
“Note: Actively engaged means:
- Exercising the privileges of an airframe and powerplant
mechanic
certificate in the maintenance of civil aircraft – ref 14CFR65.83
- Applicants who are employed full-time in inspecting,
overhauling,
repairing, preserving, or replacing parts on aircraft.
- Applicants who are employed or participate in inspecting,
overhauling, repairing, preserving, or replacing parts on aircraft on a
part-time or occasional basis will be evaluated by the ASI to determine
whether the applicant is actively engaged. The ASI will evaluate the
scope of part-time or occasional activity based on the type of
maintenance activity, including any special expertise required, and the
quantity of maintenance activity performed. To evaluate the scope of
the part-time or occasional maintenance activity, the ASI will use
evidence or documentation provided by the applicant showing inspection,
overhauling, repairing, preserving, or replacing parts on aircraft.
- Full-time instruction in technical training or training
under
14CFR147.
- Employment directly related to the airworthiness of
aircraft
(employment could have titles such as Technical Representative,
Maintenance Sales, Maintenance Coordinator, or Maintenance Auditor).
- Combination of any of the above functions.